Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SeAl's avatar

1."Education is a public good."

Agreed

2."Contrary to Brahmanical faith, you net-gain when others are also as educated as you are."

No and I am not a brahmin, don't belong to any of the privileged castes, not even a practicing Hindu.

-https://www.readkong.com/page/and-ite-review-aspire-applied-study-in-polytechnics-5679608

-https://gdc.unicef.org/resource/why-india-should-worry-about-its-educated-unemployed-youth

(Social Science/Liberal Arts/Cultural studies/Literature/Lesbian Dance Theory ?)

-https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/growing-concerns-over-graduate-employment

3."The world spends 6% of GDP on education."

The world needs a lot of things, You might wanna break that down by country and per student spending.

-https://www.statista.com/statistics/238733/expenditure-on-education-by-country/

Expand full comment
SeAl's avatar

Chaebols and Keiretsus were protected from international competition (until they built the competitiveness to do so, which is when they ventured out ) plus both Korea and Japan followed a neo-mercantilist policy. Both those states received massive economic aid from the US especially their peaks(for Japan the Korean war. for S.Korea the Vietnam war). Plus these states followed the standard model by focusing heavily first on labor intensive manufacturing first then moved to skill based manufacturing then with herculean effort moved into capital intensive higher technology domains. India in its usual embarrassingly jingoistic fashion tried to sprint before it learned how to walk, worse of all tried to do it with one hand and leg tied behind. Indians want a lot but are unwilling to make the necessary sacrifices to get to that point. As for the absence of export oriented growth you mentioned, remember one of the challenges Indian exports faces is the high logistics cost, which is largely due to the huge infrastructure deficit in India. So for the kind of growth you say you want you need massive infrastructural boost then a peaceful industrial atmosphere unencumbered by labor unrests(any and all labor unrests are a threat to industrial peace so is any kind of industry wide legal mandates that support collective bargaining, that's not even counting the de jure status quo on redundancy the effect which is self evident despite overt and subtle academic misinformation campaigns vaunting the moral supremacy of Indian labor laws ) and a market that can absorb those exports. Both of which India lacks, you have people like Adani who have moved into the infrastructure development sphere, but its unlikely to produce any imminent results. Your whole argument against crony capitalism is an indictment of the fact that you don't seem to have a fucking clue as to what is actually going on, Do you know how many states have the necessary infrastructure set up ? Aside from Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra and to a lesser extent W.Bengal most states lack the adequate infrastructure to engage in export of goods especially the land locked states of UP and Bihar who together account for nearly 300 million+ people who have large surplus of labor and do you know where these states are ranked in terms of the availability of their industrial land . When a country is as capital poor as India, you need "crony capitalists" to shore up capital build capacities and then venture out, before trying to live out your liberal fantasy. Now in Modi's defense the man has been in power for less than a decade, most importantly he has been a PM for less than a decade he tried to govern India like he would a state and he failed, he come up with shit like demonetization, realized that it was too big to be governed as such so on his second outing he improved on that and pretty much adopted the new model of Crony capitalism + import substitution + domestic industrial promotion with and without JVs with foreign players, which is not that bad a policy in the long run as long as the policy has a sunset clause of sorts. Very similar to what the South Koreans had done(I am sure PCH would approve at least some of it ). You need at least a decade of experience to govern a country like India Nehru came the closest but he was an intellectyual moron born with a silver spoon disassociated from the realities of the world assessing them through his ideological lens, worse of all he had socialist leanings and had never governed anything worthwhile before he took power.

https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2021/oct/12/tn-tops-in-india-in-industrialland-availability-2370622.html

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts